At this time of year I speak to thousands of students and trainees up and down the country who are starting their careers as teachers. It’s hugely enjoyable, fascinating and often quite inspiring.
Sometimes new young teachers ask me how to deal with difficult issues that arise in the news. A new teacher training in a secondary school told me recently how her students had made some very challenging comments and asked some difficult questions about those responsible for the murder of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich.
I suspect she may be getting similar questions about the murder of journalists and cartoonists working for Charlie Hebdo in Paris and other recent events. She said she didn’t know how to answer without expressing her own opinions in ways that might lead to misunderstanding or sounding ‘unprofessional’ and even ‘intolerant’. She asked me for advice about how to deal with such issues.
I only wish I could have been more help.
Political violence and extremism is rarely out of the news these days and they present particular challenges for teachers trying to allay fears or address the concerns of children and students.
In recent decades the teaching profession – in my view proudly - has been at the forefront of promoting ‘multiculturalism’ including the religious toleranceand celebration of cultural diversity implied by that term. Now, and not just because of what happened at Woolwich, there are clear signs that ‘multiculturalism’ and all that it stands for, is on the defensive.
The Teachers‘ Standards in England (September 2012) state that teachers ‘must not undermine fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual libertyand mutual respect, and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs‘.
All statements of values are problematic of course, and perhaps particularly so where teachers are grappling with the difficult task of integrating their own personal values with a set of professional values such as the Teachers’ Standards – as was the case with the hapless new teacher I met last week.
The coming together of personal and professional values – especially in a 'liberal' society such as ours - is usually a seamless integration of one with the other. Most teachers will look at the Teachers’ Standards and think they look more like ‘common sense’ than a professional code.
Occasionally though, there is a collision between the personal and the professional.
Some people will look at a term like ‘fundamental British values’and wonder whether we all share the same definition of that term. Others will look at the phrase “tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs” and ask why merely ‘tolerate’, and not ‘celebrate’?
Others - atheists or humanists perhaps - might suggest we should be challenging religious beliefs rather than tolerating them.
But I challenge you to ask yourself why should a teacher be professionally responsible for protecting (or “not undermining” as the Standards rather awkwardly put it) ‘individual liberty and mutual respect’.
Some parents’ culture (if not religious beliefs) view the teaching of science to females as undesirable. Should not teachers be actively undermining that particular notion of individual liberty?
Some teachers believe that ‘intelligent design‘ is a concept to be taught alongside Darwinian science. Should not all teachers be actively intolerant of such a view?
Some people in this country think burning books is a legitimate form of political protest. Should not teachers be actively dismissive of such action and assert it as barbaric? - which in my view, it is.
A couple of years ago the General Pharmaceutical Councilin the UK - the body charged with regulating the professional standardsof pharmacists – allowed pharmacists with strong religious principles to refuse to sell or prescribe products (such as the ‘morning-after’ pill and contraceptives) if they felt that doing so would ‘contradict their beliefs’.
Should pharmacists be allowed to put their religious or moral principles before the needs of their clients?
If teaching allowed that, where would we be? If some of your colleagues held the strong religious belief that, for example ‘homosexuality is a sin’ or that ‘the earth was created in seven days’, might you not think twice about whether you could exercise ‘tolerance’ or ‘mutual respect’ at a peer-professional level, let alone a personal one?
And what if a colleague finds your political, sexual or religious beliefs - or your atheism for that matter - objectionable and abhorrent? Should they have the choice of notworking with you?
I’m asking a lot of questions here… but here’s just one more…
Should teachers be a little more intolerant of those undermining the values of their profession?
Alan Newland worked as a teacher and headteacher in London for over 20 years and then for a decade with the DfE and the GTC. He now lectures on professionalism in teaching and runs the award-winning social media network newteacherstalk. You can follow him on Twitter at @newteacherstalk. His book “Working in Teaching” (Crimson Publishing) was
published in March 2014.